Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 133
In this account we show that syncretism of 2 > 1 (second person subject and first person object) with the 3 > 1 paradigm can be accounted for by the use of referrals of 2 > 1 to 3 > 1. Similarly, the 1 > 2 Sg refers to 3 > 2 Sg paradigm. As the account involves generalized referrals, which are also partly underspecified, it allows for sets of paradigm cells to be picked out (namely the 3 > 1 and 3 > 2 Sg cells).
Note: the pdf files are there to show how the files should display correctly.